you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 22 hours ago (21 children)

sure but if it doesn't happen very often there's no real reason to charge for it?

maybe it's differing alcohol cultures, idk. according to some bullshit map i saw years ago i live in the "vodka belt", so maybe i'm too drunk off of ambient fumes to get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

    Yes but the up-charge on wine is absolutely obscene and can frequently be more than what they earn on the food. Additionally, the places that can get away with this are the kind of places where arguing about what would be a relatively small charge on the bill would be so incredibly awkward that you wouldn’t dare.

    So it’s extortion basically, but fancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

    so the reason i haven't seen it is probably the alcohol tax that adds 50€/liter of pure ethanol to every beverage. it's just not useful here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

    wait.

    as in, every beverage has 50£ worth of pure ethanol added to it? if so..... no wonder Slavs are always depicted as drunk off their asses LOL

    or is it a 50£ per litre of pure ethanol on each pallet of alcoholic beverages (eg... 2l of pure ethanol adds 100£ of tax to the pallet price)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago* (6 children)

    a 10% ABV half-litre bottle will have 2.5€ in tax added to its price for the ethanol content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago (5 children)

    that is...... so incredibly -strange-.

    was this added to encourage citizens to homebrew their own alchohol, or something? thats about the only reason I could think of...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    homebrewing is very much illegal. this nation historically has a drinking problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago*

    phew, dodged a bullet there, thanks danskjävel :P

    i've read that before the alcohol monopoly laws there were about 200k distilleries in sweden which is one for every 25 people in 1910. even after the restrictions were put in place, the limit for a single meal was three schnappses ("två vita och en brun") totalling 15cl of 40-60% abv liquor. that was considered the minimum they could get away with implementing. and people still cheated the system to get double rations. i can only assume the norwegians went through something similar.

    Edit: almost forgot to mention; wine was unrestricted during that time. no rationing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 17 hours ago* (3 children)

    Here's a non-wine related thing often charged by restaurants: a cake-cutting fee. The restaurant offers desserts which you won't be buying, and yet they are supplying you with plates and forks, and they will keep your cake safe in the kitchen until dessert, bring it out to be admired with maybe candles and a song, or a toast to the happy couple, then they'll cut and plate and pass the slices, and afterwards they'll wash the dishes. So they charge a fee to pay for the people and supplies.

    We had a birthday party at a sushi train restaurant and brought a rainbow cake. We'd agreed to pay $20 or something over the total of all the sushi everyone ate. They turned down the lights and sent out the cake as individual slices on individual plates each with a lit candle flickering on it, and the teenagers loved it, which is pretty hard to do because teenagers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

    If there was no charge then everyone would bring their own, and they would have to start charging more for the food to make up for the loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

    What loss? They can lose something that they didn't had in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

    Like it or not, alcohol sales subsidize their income. The markup is substantial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

    And that still doesn't justifies the literal extortion of their clients.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments