And that by chewing it you are ingesting a bunch of microplastics? Please confirm if this is true. I don’t want to believe.

Side question: what alternative means is there for sustained, minty fresh breath that does not involve ingesting microplastics? (Mints don’t work that great imo, the freshness wears off too fast. Gum was my go-to. Now what is left?)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

I heard that myself a couple years ago and was equally disappointed/disbelieving. I started looking for more natural plant-based alternatives, but they're actually a plastic polymer too. If you're out hiking and forage for spruce/pine resin directly from the source: it's still plastic. Very surprising, not what I would have intuited.

It's not my field so I don't know if the plant-based stuff is the same level of harm as petroleum-based plastic, but I would imagine either way it's breaking down into undigestible particles that you're stuck with for life.

As far as an alternative goes for minty breath: nothing stops you from cutting out the middleman and chewing on mint leaves directly. They grow like weeds so if you get some in your garden you'll never run out. I guess the freshness probably doesn't last as long that way, but it makes up for itself in intensity which is just as important for a palate cleanser imo. You could probably get more mileage out of it by turning it into iced tea, then you can sip it whenever you need some freshness.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 21 hours ago (5 children)

    If you’re out hiking and forage for spruce/pine resin directly from the source: it’s still plastic.

    There's such a thing as naturally occurring plastic? I'm sure that's not as bad for you though, right?

    As far as an alternative goes for minty breath: nothing stops you from cutting out the middleman and chewing on mint leaves directly.

    That's an interesting idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    To my understanding (though admittedly I'm not like a materials scientist or anything so take this with a grain of salt), "plastic" is a somewhat fuzzy term, the things it generally refers to are artificial polymers, but there are also a lot of naturally occurring polymers used in biology, and it's not like chemicals care if they're made by humans or not. One could call naturally occurring polymer materials plastic, but if you did that, you would have to say that, for example, things like wood and insect shells are made of plastic, which isn't really how people generally use that word. Naturally occurring ones are probably less likely to create "microplastic" type issues though because there has generally been enough time for stuff to evolve to break those materials down, whereas purely artificial ones are too recent for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    There’s such a thing as naturally occurring plastic? I’m sure that’s not as bad for you though, right?

    Cyanide is "natural". Not everything natural is "good" and not everything artificial is "bad".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 17 hours ago

    Yes, I don't disagree, but one of the main reasons why plastics are bad for you is that they don't break down, but natural materials seem to break down just fine generally speaking

  • source
  • parent