This part gripes me when they travel to "less fortunate" or "poor" countries where eating out is $0.50-2.00 but the same or similar thing is $30-500 in the US, however: people earn different levels of income. Like in that "third world" country, people may only live with $10 a day while Americans live with either $7.25 / $15 per hour in minimum wage, so it's not comparable as to why the prices are seen as "cheap" by Americans.

Now, put it this way: if an average joe were to earn the FEDERAL mandated minimum wage of $7.25, is buying a whole weeks worth of groceries affordable with that alone (excluding rent, utilities, insurance, etc)? Do you consider a $200 semi-fancy dinner at a restaurant (not over the top luxurious, but formal & fine dining) with family or friends "cheap" in the US whilst earning $15 (or even $30) per hour in minimum wage?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

$200 for any meal is crazy expensive (unless you're feeding a table of 6). There are obviously way more expensive places out there but if I go for a rare and fancy meal for 2 it's usually under $150. And that's not a normal dining experience, because it is not seen as cheap. Cracker barrel breakfast is way more food for less than McDonald's (which is actually expensive these days).

If you make the federal minimum wage in the US, you likely qualify for government assistance to supplement your income for buying groceries in the form of what was once called "food stamps". We have large employers taking advantage of that by instructing their own employees to sign up for those benefits when they hire them, in the hopes that they then spend that food assistance at the place they work (Walmart). Effectively making our taxpayers supplement the poor wages the employer pays their employees, and turning that supplementation into their own income. The US is a grifter's paradise if you're part of the in-group.

  • source