you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I love these videos. I watch them every couple years just to re-amaze myself at how very possible it was for like 2 people that simply understand how levers work to get 50 other people to do an amazing amount of stuff.

Now, if you want to accidentally turn yourself into a "conspiracy theorist," you can also learn about geopolymers, and make the extremely reasonable jump to ancient people in places with the right combination of salts could make water glass and both dissolve and form granite. Granite is an aggregate, so if you just take sand from places where people mined monolithic granite objects, you can use water glass to chemically melt the quartz, turn the sand into a soft polymer that takes a week to fully cure back into what looks like granite from the same quarry.

Works for limestone as well. So when you consider the likelihood that pyramid blocks were likely simply cast in place with readily available materials, it sort of makes you angry at the traditionalists that say everything was carved, and the ancient aliens people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    This is fascinating. I love that they're wearing costumes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Right? Leave it to the French to think "We're doing this 100% authentic!" and mean how they dress for it.

    For what it's worth, I've made some natron bricks from dirt in the yard (natron you can make by cooking baking soda) just to see what I would get. Seemed like regular dirt at first, then after a week, they were shockingly solid. I expect with limestone gravel, it would work even better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    While casting was possible, it has already been considered and dismissed. The reason in Egypt is that the quarry still exists with unfinished blocks, and they documented with pictures how they cut the blocks and the blocks show the cutting marks that are described in the pictures the Egyptians left. For all the pic of cutting and moving the blocks, there are no pic of casting.

    In the case of Stonehenge, core samples have been taken that show it wasn't cast. A few of the stones weren't moved but were already naturally there.
    https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2018/04/12/parts-of-stonehenge-may-have-been-in-place-long-before-humans/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago

    I'm aware - the unfinished obelisk is a prime example.

    However, large copper chisels and blades don't account for fine detail carvings or many of the thin bowls and vases made from granite. There are pooling marks and dripping marks on the top of the Serapeum which clearly indicate that some chemical process was involved. Why carve pooling marks into one slab on purpose? Why spend time carving intricate shapes when you can carve the obelisk, then cast the carvings in wax and geopolymer.

    I'm saying that a combination of both methods were used. When you know how easy it is to cast something, then quarrying a solid slab stone would have been a huge flex.

  • source
  • parent