Actually I'm kind of confused by your response too. First of all you didn't provide evidence of anything because your link is about a plan to vote not one that already passed, so technically you gave zero evidence of anything. But I will assume they passed the vote, just to move forward the conversation. More pertinent maybe the actual article seems to support what the other people in this thread are saying and not what you're saying. So I'm confused why you think what you posted was such Rock Solid evidence:
To increase accountability, the Council will vote on a bill that will effectively end qualified immunity as a defense for certain civil rights violations.
So the people saying they only ended it in certain cases seem correct based upon your own evidence. What am I missing here?