Ahh okay, bringing it up in this context made it appear as though the motivations of either people who subscribe to that misinformation, or the groups that propagate it would align in some way with a potential misinformation campaign that would effect trans peoples' ability to access information. The systemic violence described below suffices, so I'd be surprised if there was such a campaign that actually worked on what is a substantially different target audience.

I'm privileged to have had that money and time, many trans people do not. It's important to remember that many of us experience shelter- and other forms of material insecurity at disproportionate rates, and that is not disconnected from the overwhelmingly high suicide and self-harm rates for young trans people. Slow delivery of care with the caveat of privilege for access does literally constitute the systemic violence that perpetuates those rates.

I mentioned this in another comment on this thread, but I think it is a perfectly acceptable cost to introduce a potential generalized risk by expanding access and substantially mitigating the preexisting and specific forms of violence that trans people experience. I don't see how it is reasonable to argue that a less immediate and threatening risk to a general population which regularly refuses us care is an unacceptable cost to address the needs of our own community. We already have information and support networks in place within our community for this very reason.