you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Whomever allowed that robot outside is to blame. If they have grievances, they can sue whomever wrote the software or built the device. Keep sending the buck up until it reaches the top.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    The responsibility should lie with the company that decided the robot was safe enough to deploy. How it distributes liability among its developers, manufacturers and suppliers is its problem, not the public's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 58 minutes ago (1 child)

    When it’s a criminal matter, the assigment of blame is absolutely a public matter. If you or I caused a car accident with irresponsible use of an RC car or a consumer drone, we would be facing criminal prosecution. The fact that no one is likely to face charges in this case is a huge failure of public policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 53 minutes ago

    💯 That's an important distinction: Civil liability determines who pays for the damage, while criminal responsibility addresses whether someone's negligence was serious enough to constitute a crime. And that question absolutely deserves public scrutiny. Automation must not become a shield against criminal accountability.

  • source
  • parent