▲ 205 ▼ [Meta Discussion] How would people feel about requiring posters to tag games made with AI? (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 5 days ago by SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/freegames@feddit.uk 112 comments fedilink hide all child comments I see a lot of free games on here that are made with AI, and personally i'm not interested in AI generated content. If other people feel the same way, maybe we could start tagging posts accordingly?
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 point 4 days ago (2 children) Maybe look up a definition for me lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) I mean sure I guess of beliefs or principles, especially one on which a political system, party, or organization is based: "socialist/capitalist ideology" "The people are caught between two opposing ideologies." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ideology There is colloquial use of the term to refer specifically to beliefs/principles held in contrast to what evidence supports, but I don't think you can make an argument for this overriding the general meaning of the term, especially when it comes to (hopefully) educated discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 point 4 days ago Great. Well done. I don't believe that beliefs or principles (such as those supporting political parties) are hills worth dying on because they are, by definition, unsupported by reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) I mean sure I guess of beliefs or principles, especially one on which a political system, party, or organization is based: "socialist/capitalist ideology" "The people are caught between two opposing ideologies." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ideology There is colloquial use of the term to refer specifically to beliefs/principles held in contrast to what evidence supports, but I don't think you can make an argument for this overriding the general meaning of the term, especially when it comes to (hopefully) educated discussion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 point 4 days ago Great. Well done. I don't believe that beliefs or principles (such as those supporting political parties) are hills worth dying on because they are, by definition, unsupported by reason. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 1 point 4 days ago Great. Well done. I don't believe that beliefs or principles (such as those supporting political parties) are hills worth dying on because they are, by definition, unsupported by reason. permalink fedilink source parent