I used the actually evidence-backed parts of the article. Of course the Wikipedia editors are going to dress it up in a negative way, I figured that was obvious. But looking at what is backed by hard evidence, it supports what I said. As for looking pathetic, I'm not the one that refuses to even engage with the argument at hand and dodges it entirely. Downvotes aren't for disagreement, but for comments that genuinely don't add anything, which has been your last few comments for sure.

I know you're fully capable of grappling with what I've said and the evidence provided. I'm not even bringing out textbooks or anything, this is just Wikipedia so it's very short.