Ask Lemmy

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (4 children)

My confusion has less to do with reading comprehension and more to do with trying to unpack your bizarre logic. Also I'm not your pal.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] NoxVector@fedinsfw.app [S] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

My confusion has less to do with reading comprehension and more to do with trying to unpack your bizarre logic. Also I’m not your pal.

If my logic is so bizarre, surely someone with your supposedly superior comprehension could dismantle it instead of writing a paragraph about how confused you are. And the "I'm not your pal" clarification? Don't flatter yourself. It was sarcasm, not a friendship application. Try addressing the argument next time; you might actually contribute something worth reading.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, happy to. You talk about down votes coming from misogynists, with no evidence whatsoever to support that claim. Meanwhile your entire post history seems to be made up of attempts to identify random women for you to goon to. Seems a little hypocritical to me.

You speak as though the Lemmy experience is beneath you, so why don't you leave? We have enough condescending losers around here already without you.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] NoxVector@fedinsfw.app [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

blunderworld@lemmy.ca

Sure, happy to. You talk about down votes coming from misogynists, with no evidence whatsoever to support that claim. Meanwhile your entire post history seems to be made up of attempts to identify random women for you to goon to. Seems a little hypocritical to me. You speak as though the Lemmy experience is beneath you, so why don’t you leave? We have enough condescending losers around here already without you.

Sure, happy to.

You called my logic “bizarre,” then when challenged to actually explain what was supposedly wrong with it, you pivoted to:

Demanding evidence for an observation about downvotes.
Digging through my post history to accuse me of “gooning.”
Telling me to leave the community.

That's not dismantling an argument. That's a tantrum with extra steps.

Wanting to know who an attractive person is doesn't automatically equal “gooning.” If it did, every reverse image search, every “who is this actress?” thread, and every celebrity identification post on the internet would qualify. The fact that you immediately jumped to that conclusion says considerably more about your assumptions than it does about my intentions.

And the “why don't you leave” closer? That's not an argument either. This community isn't your personal property, and you don't get to decide who participates simply because you dislike their posts or opinions.

You accused me of having bizarre logic, yet somehow managed to write an entire response without addressing the actual point. That's quite an achievement in avoiding a discussion while pretending to participate in one.

Have a nice day, pal. 🤡😂

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago*

Sure "pal" whatever you say. That's a lot of words to use while not refuting my points whatsoever.

You can do whatever you want, but what you say and how you act doesn't add up. Speaking for myself, I down voted you because these aren't the kinds of posts I'm interested in seeing, and because you seem especially thin skinned and awkward.

But it seems like every accusation is a confession with you, so I'll save my breath. Instead, I'll let the people decide whether you're gooning or not by leaving this here. Didn't exactly take much 'digging'.