you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Do americans actually do math with imperial system at school? That must be a nightmare and have conversion errors between units.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    This is a common misconception. Americans can't do math and don't learn anything at school

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Kinda.... The classes "teach" imperial but guns/bullets are metric

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    It's a pretty heavy mix, many of the most popular rounds are also referenced by their metric size but they're not usually 'useful' sizes in either standard or metric.

    For example:

    • .22 LR = .223in = 5.56 NATO
    • 9mm = .357 mag
    • .40 S&W = 10mm Auto
    • .308 = 7.62mm
    • .44 = no common metric eq.
    • .45 = no common metric eq.
    • .50 = 12.7mm
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    There's almost never a need to involve units outside of science which typically is metric anyway. Also most of these units aren't really ever converted between, no one gives a measurement as 1 mile 300 yards 2 feet 6 inches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    no one gives a measurement as 1 mile 300 yards 2 feet 6 inches.

    When this topic came up yet another time previously, USian engineers proudly chimed in saying that their software accepts any kinds of units and converts between them as needed, so they put in US units without bothering about whether metric units are used elsewhere in the project. Ergo, someone does in fact give measurements like in your example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    I have very occasionally seen measurements given in yd + in or yd. + dec ft. I have never once seen measurements given in any of yd + ft + in, mi + yd, mi + yd + ft and definitely never in mi + yd + ft + in. That would be like giving a measurement in km + dm + cm + mm, there's just no reason to do it. Any cad software I've ever used is capable of handling mixed units because it's trivial to implement, but I would be willing to bet it's one of the most underutilized features.

  • source
  • parent