Psssst (img-9gag-fun.9cache.com)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 days ago* (6 children)

Lets take a look at "good":

  • supported kidnapping and bombing kids
  • supported a highly unpopular president
  • supported a genocide
  • told americans to stop complaining about being screwed over.
  • abandoned trans people

I think your definition of "good" might need a little work.

You are correct that we don't change. We believe in things like equal rights, why would we change that?

It's always so telling that, when provided with evidence, Libs immediatly turn on the people who privide the evidence, rather than on the party that keeps screwing them over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    Agreed, theyre all terrible. But 1 is slightly less terrible than the other. So youre saying its better to not vote at all? Thats where I don't agree. What are you actually doing to change anything ?

    Also not a liberal.

    "Abandoned trans people" wow thats so terrible compared to the R's that openly advocate for murdering them (and gay people) and support christian nationalist terrorists. Come on here, one party is clearly doing a hell of a lot worse shit than the other.

    I'm agreeing that both are bad but what is not voting going to do about that? Youre not proving youre better than the system by not participating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    So youre saying its better to not vote at all?

    Can you point out where I said that? Because I'm pretty confident that I never did.

    What are you actually doing to change anything ?

    Voting against the people who got us into this mess. Supporting mutual aid networks, and charities. Supporting the homeless. Building and pushing FOSS systems.

    Also not a liberal.

    If you aren't a liberal, then why are you defending the worst of liberal policies and people?

    “Abandoned trans people” wow thats so terrible compared to the R’s that openly advocate for murdering them (and gay people) and support christian nationalist terrorists. Come on here, one party is clearly doing a hell of a lot worse shit than the other.

    So it's OK that the Dems use them as pawns, rather than grow a spine and support marginalized people? Dems only use them because they are easily visible. Look at what the Dems to to immigrants, or people in other countries. They are just biding their time before they go mask-off towards trans people.

    I’m agreeing that both are bad but what is not voting going to do about that? Youre not proving youre better than the system by not participating.

    Once again, where did I say that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    OK good, as long as youre not advocating for not voting.

    And in my state, all the ballot choices suck ass , as usual, but I'm still not voting for any R.

    All my ballots have are 3 R's and 1 D. We dont get much of a choice here.

    Just saying, not supporting a group and openly advocating to murder a group are not the same thing. You seriously think the Rs are better for trans people than Ds ?

    Thats good, keep doing those things!! I help where I can.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Just saying, not supporting a group and openly advocating to murder a group are not the same thing. You seriously think the Rs are better for trans people than Ds ?

    Can you point out where I said that? because I'm pretty sure I never did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    OK then I don't get why youre bringing it up. We agree theyre both bad choices but one is quiteeeee a bit worse. So we should all vote, while also being involved in activism against a 2 party system the rest of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment