192
'A Father Is Always Gonna Be Sexually Attracted to His Daughter': Steven Tyler's Comments About Liv Resurface Amid Abuse Lawsuit (www.fashiontimes.co.uk)
submitted 6 days ago by to c/fauxmoi@sh.itjust.works
99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

'A father is always gonna be sexually attracted to his daughter...' A controversial remark made by Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler about his daughter, actress Liv Tyler, is once again making rounds on social media. The statement, published in Gavin Edwards' 2006 book Is Tiny Dancer Really Elton's Little John?, has resurfaced as the 78-year-old singer faces an unresolved California civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a teenager in the 1970s.

Tyler denies wrongdoing in the case brought by Julia Misley, who says she was 16 when their relationship began in 1973. A judge narrowed her lawsuit in April 2026 but allowed allegations involving California to proceed.

Despite the pending lawsuit, Tyler has returned to performing, joining Aerosmith at the Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles on 29 October 2026. The concert marked the band's first full live performance since 2023, following a vocal injury that forced the group to retire from touring. His daughter Liv, 49, and actress Alicia Silverstone introduced the band before the performance.

Tyler's return to the stage comes as he continues to fight allegations of sexual abuse in court. At the Hollywood Bowl, the singer performed Aerosmith classics including 'Dream On', 'Sweet Emotion' and 'Walk This Way', with Dave Grohl joining the band on drums.The performance was part of a two-night concert event held on 29 October and 1 November 2026, even as Tyler's civil lawsuit remains unresolved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Steven Tyler is a rapist because he chooses to be a rapist, and he is a pedophile because he refuses to get treatment for a mental illness that urges him to abuse children. It has NOTHING to do with his gender or sexual identity, as "rapist and pedophile" is not a gender or sexual identity. You can call these people out for their actual crimes without gay bashing. Someone being afraid, anxious, unsure of how to express their identity to others, or just not wanting to, does not turn them into a sexual predator. It's entirely unrelated, and it's common right wing rhetoric to correlate LGBTQ identity with sexual abuse propensity.

I already have you tagged as a mysogynist, so the benefit of the doubt that you're accidentally being an ignorant bigot is flimsy at best

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 6 days ago (9 children)

    Whoa there. Nice twisting my words there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    That didn’t happen. And if it did, it wasn’t that bad. And if it was, that’s not a big deal. And if it is, that’s not my fault. And if it was, I didn’t mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Yes, you tipped your hand once your tagging as misogynistic is the core authority for your judgements of me till the end of time, because in one post I said “pretty woman”.

    Nothing I say or do will change your mind, but where I’m from (a misogynistic, ableist, zionist, absolutist and rapist town in the middle of nowhere) it is still possible to talk about how closeted sexual orientation actually can be damaging to society, without automatically condemning the sexual orientation.

    You’re clearly sensitive to this, so no point in arguing. Take care.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    Would you like me to provide screenshots of you being a mysogynist? That can be arranged. You did not just call someone pretty. You called them a pretty girl, a chick, commented on their makeup use, and then used all of that to claim that they were too dumb to understand the topic. The topic itself? The woman, a diabetic, was doing an incredible service to the world by pointing out and making it known that Dexcom is making diabetic care harder for their clients intentionally. You then also made a very off-putting comment about well groomed boys before running off.

    I will reiterate that gender and sexual orientation is not correlated to someone being a sexual abuser. Boiling it down to "they're gay and repressed so they commit crimes" is disgusting and you know it. This is not up for debate, it is not a fact. It is right wing propaganda to isolate and vilify minority groups.

    Perhaps instead of using that tired and honestly offensive "minorities around me are targeted so I'll use my judgement for them" dialogue, you should shut the fuck up and actually listen to what they say. I showed your comment to several people in my very LGBTQ heavy social group today, and the consensus was that you were being a vile pig. You won't reflect on that even for a moment, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 days ago

    They don’t like women is the point. They like grown men’s asses and kids. The women part is what they do to “blend in”

    This is not talking about how closeted sexual orientation can be damaging, this is literally equating homosexuals with pedophiles.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    They're absolutely correct. These men aren't rapists because they're closeted homosexuals.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •