transcription: open letter to the lgbtq. dear lgbtq, you are the most inclusive community i know. it is an honor to hang with you. i think it is time to step up your game and add one more letter. s as in straight. -slgbtq supporter.

THE STRAIGHTS ARE AT IT AGAIN. putting the s at the front of lgbtq is by far the straightest straight person thing i have ever seen

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

IIRC I have seen versions of the initialism that include A for “Ally.” Which suits me just fine.

Edit: I’m well aware that the first A is for Asexual. I’m not trying to co-opt anything. Explainers like this are what I’m referring to. I’m sorry if what I said was offensive.

For those who don’t want to click the link, here’s the explanation that page gives for the initialism:

L - Lesbian
G - Gay
B - Bisexual
T - Transgender
Q - Queer
Q - Questioning
I - Intersex
P - Pansexual
2S - Two-Spirit
A - Asexual
A - Allies

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I remember someone suggesting a 4 letter acronym that was more "all inclusive" so it wouldn't require adding letters and symbols every so often. It didn't seem to take off and I can't remember what the 4 letters were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    GSRM maybe? stands for gender, sexual, or romantic minority. I like it more than LGBTQIA+, but its use is uncommon. But at this point "queer" as a catch-all seems to work just fine and avoids the acronym inclusivity issue.

    (notable exception being, I'm not sure if two-spirit people consider themselves queer? it is not defined in relation to colonial gender norms as "queer" is, but it is also commonly included in the acronym. anyone know?)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    A real ally wouldn't be co-opting queer culture and inserting themselves in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Please refer to my edit to my original post. I don’t want to co-opt anything. I can completely understand wanting something your own, and in no way do I want to infringe on it. I want to support in any way I can. I’m just relaying an explanation I’ve seen for expanded, extra-inclusive versions of the initialism. I’m sorry if what I said was offensive.

  • source
  • parent