you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 child)

When its an adjective with no propaganda and vitriol being spewed about it, its murkier. But when you say "trans-(wo)man" or "black-(wo)man" or something like that, even though it is grammatically acceptable I believe, you risk the implication that the object you describe is a distinct, other object from a "normal" (wo)man.

Edit: also, thank you for editing your original comment - not many are as open to feedback

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment