you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 days ago* (3 children)

Exactly.

They're committed to render themselves useless: if people, aka citizens, do indeed need to pay a sub for accessing media they won't own (like stuff borrowed from the public library) why should they then be expected to also pay taxes in order to subsidies those public libraries, as well as the librarian's salaries? What will be their purpose in that model?

I'm really surprised the employees are not working hard against such a shift, it's quite obvious this won't end up well for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (2 children)

    From what I have been told when talking to them, they just see the music and movies as a waste of money and space.. But yeah, full agree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    In a world so obsessed with reducing costs, as public servants, they should really be a lot more careful when pointing out at anything as 'a waste of money'. Really.

    Feel free to share with them that comment from a random French dude, that probably has no clue at all what he is talking about, you chatted with online on that odd reddit-like forum ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment