you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I never said it was. But, I'm also not an investor. I'm just saying the kind of things that scare off investors. And this would be a big one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    What? The literal extermination of the human race is not enough to scare off investors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    At this point, I think they believe it’s a good indicator of potential. A way of saying just how awesome and magical and powerful the AI is.

    Otherwise the "AI went off the rails and breached X companies servers" would also have been met with contempt and negatively impacted them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I still can't wrap my head around how this strategy ("buy our models, they are so powerful they might kill all humans") would work in their favor, apart from one thing: restrictions would hurt Chinese models probably more than themselves. But I find it very unlikely that characters like Altman or Amodei would be capable of playing that kind of 4d chess. It's a weird flex

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    No, but if you were an investor, would you invest in a product that would make it so people can easiy recreate your other products so that they stop buying your other products? Ending humanity doesn't scare them but making $0.75 less this year does

  • source
  • parent