you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The difference is that the banks are actually necessary for the economy to function. And mitigations were put in place to limit that exposure in the future. Mitigations that have been stripped back again in recent years because of billionaire lobbying.

None of the AI companies are necessary for the economy. And the big players that stepped into the quagmire aren't over leveraged enough to actually be in danger. Only the AI-only companies are in danger. The mega corps like Meta, Microsoft, Google, etc. would be hurt but would survive just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    It’s actually the wealthy that would suffer if it goes tits up, and if things are actually changed to put the nation on a path to recovery. Think about Europe post ww2 and how fucked their infrastructure and economies were and what it took to rebuild within 3 generations to the point they were actually thriving comparatively. That took coming together and reinvesting in society, nations building. The wealthy don’t want to do that. But that’s what it would take to recover and restart the economy, because there is no flow to the bottom 98% anymore. The wealthy would have to willingly reboot it by going back to putting their fair share back into circulation and earmark it for rebuilding.

  • source
  • parent