Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,543 readers

13,839 active

2,408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Solar Panels Are Now Producing So Much Power That They’re Leaving Nuclear Plants in the Dust: "Solar is now the engine of the power transition." (futurism.com)

submitted 1 week ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

411 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

what is your standard of evidence? you've moved the goalposts three times now. first it was "define efficiency", then "by the definition solar is better", and now this which i still don't understand

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[+] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

[deleted]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago

I have been searching and providing you with sources. Give me a source that compares any of these other definitions of energy I haven't yet covered between nuclear and solar. Per land is the only one widely accepted and what an expert will assume the title says.