▲ 1148 ▼ Solar Panels Are Now Producing So Much Power That They’re Leaving Nuclear Plants in the Dust: "Solar is now the engine of the power transition." (futurism.com) submitted 1 week ago by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 411 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago* (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) what is your standard of evidence? you've moved the goalposts three times now. first it was "define efficiency", then "by the definition solar is better", and now this which i still don't understand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago I have been searching and providing you with sources. Give me a source that compares any of these other definitions of energy I haven't yet covered between nuclear and solar. Per land is the only one widely accepted and what an expert will assume the title says. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago what does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) what is your standard of evidence? you've moved the goalposts three times now. first it was "define efficiency", then "by the definition solar is better", and now this which i still don't understand permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago I have been searching and providing you with sources. Give me a source that compares any of these other definitions of energy I haven't yet covered between nuclear and solar. Per land is the only one widely accepted and what an expert will assume the title says. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 week ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago I have been searching and providing you with sources. Give me a source that compares any of these other definitions of energy I haven't yet covered between nuclear and solar. Per land is the only one widely accepted and what an expert will assume the title says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago I have been searching and providing you with sources. Give me a source that compares any of these other definitions of energy I haven't yet covered between nuclear and solar. Per land is the only one widely accepted and what an expert will assume the title says. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 week ago what does this even mean permalink fedilink source parent