you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hvis det her er formuleringen i kommunikationen, tolker jeg det som alt brug er forbudt.

Linus Torvalds havde en god kommentar på brug af AI til kerne-udvikling:

I don't understand this whole idiotic concept of "don't use AI for X".

Here's a new rule just for you: don't use compilers for any of your kernel submissions.

Because if you can't show that you really understand what the machine is actually doing by writing your code in assembler, then I don't want to see your code contribution. You clearly aren't competent if you can't write it that way.

And btw, you had better not use an editor to write that commit message either.

Because I need you to show me that you can actually write a good commit message without using tools that make it easy to backspace and hide the mistakes you made while typing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    En compiler er jo deterministisk - men, det er jo et helt andet domæne end litteratur og oversættelse. Det meste kode ser man ikke, men når det kommer til litteratur er sproget jo produktet og resultatet. Jeg forstår godt deres politik - that said, så har jeg ikke noget problem med AI brugt som tooling (ud over de etiske og miljømæssige issues, of course).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments