463
New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism (www.whitehouse.gov)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

By real, I mean an LLM anchored in objective consensus reality. It should be able to interpolate between truths. Right now it interpolates between significant falsehoods with truths sprinkled in.

It won't be perfect but it can be a lot better than it is now, which is starting to border on useless for any type of serious engineering or science.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's just... Not how they work.

    Equally, from your other comment: a parameter for truthiness, you just can't tokenise that in a language model. One word can drastically change the meaning of a sentence.

    LLMs are very good at one thing: making probable strings of tokens (where tokens are, roughly, words).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Yeah, you can. The current architecture doesn't do this exactly, but what I am saying is a new method that includes truthiness is needed. The fact that LLMs predict probable tokens means it already includes a concept of this, because probabilities themselves are a measure of "truthiness."

    Also, I am speaking in abstract. I don't care what they can and can't do. They need to have a concept of truthiness. Use your imagination and fill in the gaps to what that means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent