463
New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism (www.whitehouse.gov)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

That's just... Not how they work.

Equally, from your other comment: a parameter for truthiness, you just can't tokenise that in a language model. One word can drastically change the meaning of a sentence.

LLMs are very good at one thing: making probable strings of tokens (where tokens are, roughly, words).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Yeah, you can. The current architecture doesn't do this exactly, but what I am saying is a new method that includes truthiness is needed. The fact that LLMs predict probable tokens means it already includes a concept of this, because probabilities themselves are a measure of "truthiness."

    Also, I am speaking in abstract. I don't care what they can and can't do. They need to have a concept of truthiness. Use your imagination and fill in the gaps to what that means.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent