you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 97 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

J JA JAME

Netflix: James Bond?

Me: Yes!

Netflix: We don't have it!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    From a UX perspective, would you prefer the site pretends they never heard of James Bond, rahter than confirming it's existence and (un)availability?
    I don't use Netflix, so I apologise if the UI is actually intentionally misleading, but that otherwise sounds like good UX.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I'm not sure. I think I'd prefer if it did something like:

    James Bond (not available on Netflix)

    That way I wouldn't have to click through to see whether it's on there.

    I guess the status quo feels shitty to me because aside from dealing with the disappointment of not having the content I want, they will also try and vie for my time with content they think is similar to what I was looking for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago*

    Yeah that sounds best, save unnecessary click/confirm but still acknowledge the query.

    I doubt Netflix wants to show:
    Search: A
    AB (unavailable)
    ABC (unavailable)
    ABCD (unavailable)
    So probably a gray/dark pattern...

  • source
  • parent