you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Not a very good comic for the current state of things. Right now being anti-gun is at best suicidal and at worst straight up traitorous. You can't afford to be anti-gun when the government is literally turning fascist.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    Thank god americans all have guns, otherwise they would live under a fascist pedophile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (6 children)

    And you'd rather have literally nothing when the fascists all have them?

    If you don't participate in an arms race you're the next person to be subjugated. We know everyone loses in one, but not participating at all is suicidal. You can't afford to be neutral on a moving train.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    If you don't participate in an arms race you're the next person to be subjugated

    Would you say the same for AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Not the person you are asking, but I wouldn't. AI is rather an arms race towards who atrophies their brains first by offloading thinking onto AI. The only winning move is not to play, or at least don't be stupid about using it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago*

    There's gonna be a LOT of destruction in the meantime.

    And the most fucked up part of it all, is that, even BEFORE AI, there are all kinds of problems.

    Do you think if we implemented ubi, that it would accelerate the dumbing?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Atrophy doesn't matter in war, only capability to harm your opponent.

    In the early modern period in Europe you could argue that the European armies martial arts ability in close quarters combat that had been developed over centuries was atrophying as they relied more on guns. But that doesn't matter if 50 guys with guns can defeat 5 highly trained knights and those 50 guys are cheaper to find and replace.

    Same with AI, it won't matter if you have a couple more highly trained hackers and security experts if there up against a swarm of AI agents who have proven very capable of cyber attacks.

    Agents are the guns of cyber warfare. Any idiot can pick them up easily and do a lot of harm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    The left will never win an arms race against the right. Even discounting their gigantic headstart they also have way more money and resources and the backing of the arms manufacturers to get more weapons.

    Our best bet is to try and put up as much gun control as possible and try and reduce the advantage they already have, not try and start a losing war that'll get us killed.

    Or be like Switzerland and give every man military training and a gun from the state to completely even the playing field.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Not that there's not merit to the mainstream right having more firearms than the mainstream 'left', but I think you might be discounting how many people left of the center are firearm owners in America. If you're speaking from a perspective of civil unrest leading to political violence, I dont feel any group will have a hard time obtaining firearms, rather they'd be bottlenecked by the amount of supporters they can find to wield such firearms. A lot of people are talk, yet when you give someone a gun and say they might die for a cause, it vastly lowers how many truly want to enact violence.

  • source
  • parent