The argument that property taxes make Americans renters in their own houses has fueled the biggest anti-tax uprising in half a century, and local governments are scrambling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A Los Angeles resident who has owned a home for 50 years that’s now worth $1 million pays less than $500 annually in property taxes. Yet if their neighbor spent $1 million to buy the house next door last year they would owe $10,000.

Doesn't fixing this lead to gentrification, though? Take a bunch of low cost property, raise the value of the properties, increase the taxes, and force poor owners out in lieu of wealthier home buyers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Usually, when we talk about gentrification, it is in terms of changes to the rental price as a result of changes in the local business environment, like firms opening and closing amd changes in wages; however, you are correct that the economics function roughly the same way when the government is raising property taxes to force a couple of empty nesters living off their 401k out of a 5 bedroom household to move to a 1 bedroom apartment as when an apartment complex is raising rents to force a young working family out of their two bedroom apartment to a less desirable neighborhood by raising the rent, especially because both can happen when a new park opens up down the street.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    force poor owners out

    This would increase the supply so it would reduce the value of the property and possibly rents because of that.

    So it would harm poorer homeowners but may help renters, who tend to be even poorer.

  • source
  • parent