you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 93 points 1 year ago (38 children)
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Lot of US leftists and liberals hate guns, as a reaction to the right’s obsession with them.

    It is a stupid and dangerous reaction, because they give up their means of self-defense against far right militias and a fascist government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don't hate guns, I hate the "gun rights" movements and there fetishization of a skewed interpretation of the second amendment where any individual has the unalieanable right to own a gun.

    Even if a violent revolution were to happen, which odds are 99 to 1 it wont happen in the US in our lifetimes, then people like op hoarding guns aren't going to help. A well regulated militia might but that requires social organization and discipline, which most people in the gun rights movement don't have the time or willingness for.

    They aren't serious about using guns to defend liberty, they just like the aesthetic of it and make it part of there personality. So much so that they get offended by dumb and probably made up stories like this but not the countless other similar stories where there were no red flag laws and the gf gets killed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Then they post about how the gun owners aren't doing anything to stop the fascist government. Yea, you've been alienating them for decades. They're not on your side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I think we just don't like guns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Speak for yourself. God forbid men should have a hobby.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Are you really pretending this is about men having hobbies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I use my rifles for hunting. Some people like collecting and sport shooting. Some have theirs for self defense in higher crime areas because they can't afford better. So yeah?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It can be a hobby, sure. But men having a hobby isnt was was being discussed at all. Nobody cares about men having hobbies, the issue is when this hobby is a potential threat to other people. Isnt this rather obvious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You know exactly as much as I do about this hypothetical situation. Girlfriend cheats. Guy breaks up. Girl calls cops. Guy gets guns confiscated. If your argument is nothing more than "Well maybe he deserved it" you're an asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thats just not what im saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It sure feels like what you're saying is that due process goes out the window for things you don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    Dunno, someone having guns to shoot normal people is a big red flag to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    "Ah yes, someone is trying to break into my house, let's go down to the shop and buy a gun"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    If you think before posting, ask yourself: is it normal to break into people's homes?

    And even then, here we don't worry about criminals with guns that much. The USA is idiotic in that regard, with its pervasive gun culture, resulting in weekly mass shootings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you think before posting, ask yourself: is it normal to break into people's homes?

    No. It's incredibly disturbing behaviour, and in the USA they are likely armed as well. They're not going to nicely ask you not to resist them. That's why you need to have a gun so you can shoot them before they shoot you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    With that mindset everyone will have guns, so violence then actually increases.

    The only answer is to dearm everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, I think we're all in agreement about that here. But everyone isn't disarmed. I won't give up my gun until I know with 99% certainty that your average burglar won't get a hold of an illegal firearm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    In most of the UK, even the average police officer isn't armed. (In Northern Ireland, the average police officer is armed, but the amount of times the firearms are ever actually fired is incredibly rare. Most of the time they go off is actually negligent. When they do go off, they are always investigated.)

    The problem is, how do you disarm the bad guys when you've been giving them guns without tracking them for decades

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I didn't ask to be born in a country where burglars are likely to have firearms. But now that I am, I have to react to that fact myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I am pro gun control, but if I lived in the USA, I'd own a gun. My opinions are for the ballot box and don't matter whenever someone is breaking into my house and threatening the lives of my wife and my children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I'm against gun control generally, live in the US, and don't own a gun. Why? The chance that my kids find my guns and play with them causing a tragedy is much higher than the chance I'll need to use a gun. Crime is incredibly low in my area, with the most pressing crime on my neighbors' minds being a "break-in" (nobody locks their doors) several years before we moved in by akid in the neighborhood, and we've been here >10 years without any incidents.

    So yeah, guns are more of a liability for me than a useful tool. However, not everyone lives in my area, so need for guns absolutely varies by area. I'd absolutely prefer an armed populace to the government having a monopoly on guns.

    I do agree w/ sensible restrictions, and most mass shootings would be averted if we actually enforced the laws we have. Most of the time, someone close to the shooter knew they were a risk yet did nothing.

    Most firearm deaths are either gang related or suicides. The solution there isn't banning guns, but solving the underlying problems. For those, I support:

    • drug legalization - cuts down on incarceration, which should reduce conversions to organized crime
    • cash redistribution - my preference is NIT, which is similar to UBI; helps prevent people from getting desperate
    • reform prison system to focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment - maybe prisons get funded based on reduced recidivism?

    IMO, guns aren't the problem, they're a tool. We need to solve the actual problems instead of putting kid gloves on everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why? The chance they my kids find my guns and play with them causing a tragedy is much higher than the chance I'll need to use a gun. Crime is incredibly low in my area, with the most pressing crime on my neighbors' minds being a "break-in" (nobody locks their doors) several years before we moved in by akid in the neighborhood, and we've been here >10 years without any incidents.

    Valid. But it's different if you are a transgender person living by yourself (i have heard and don't question the claim that transgender people in some areas may have their lives threatened)

    most mass shootings would be averted if we actually enforced the laws we have.

    Wasn't there a school shooting in America where the police tried to "contain" the shooter instead of confronting him? By contain, leave him in a class of kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • transgender person

    Right, which is a huge part of why I'm pro-gun despite not wanting them in my house. I think they're very useful tools to have for a lot of people, so they should be accessible.

    Wasn’t there a school shooting in America where the police tried to “contain” the shooter instead of confronting him? By contain, leave him in a class of kids.

    Probably. I know there were at least cases where the police waited outside.

    I'm very much in favor of arming and training teachers. I trust a teacher to protect my kids way more than a police officer, even if they're stationed permanently at the school. They shouldn't be compelled of course, but it should be an option w/ free training provided by the local police dept or gun club.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)