Yeah, I can honestly empathize with the people who believe this. Everything feels exhausting, overwhelming, and like nothing will ever change. Unfortunately for the people of that opinion though, NOT voting will ensure nothing changes. Or rather, that you had no hand in changing anything. Because everything will change eventually for good or bad.

Hello three day old account trying to dissuade voter turnout! If progressives and leftists voted in primaries we'd have a progressive leftist Democratic party, but progressives and leftists don't vote for the most part. But you know that since you're not here in good faith anyway. The phrase "typical democrat arrogance" gives you away, gotta stop using your fox news terms MAGAt.

The question was "why don't they vote like it?" I answered the question from what I've been told by multiple coworkers and family. I didn't say, "this is my opinion." In fact, I said this is not my opinion and I did vote. Just because you don't like the answer, doesn't mean a lot of people don't believe that. I think it's a terrible argument personally however, the question didn't ask my opinion, it was asking why those people don't vote like it. I simply shared what has been told directly to me by the people who refuse to vote.

I strongly disagree. I certainly understand why this idea has risen to the forefront, but I find this mentality to be far more obtuse than attempting to flesh out the nuance of a situation. Assessing both sides of an argument is of utmost importance. Qualifying the pursuit of more accurate information as "stupid" is peak irony.

I know, the internet is full of bots and rabble rousers. No doubt they are directed at divisive issues and engage in "both sides" messaging to cast doubt on popular sentiment and advance some propaganda. This is annoying and a real problem, but the wholesale rejection of valid observation or analysis, with reactive, myopic aphorisms is precisely the type of response that allows propaganda to continue its insidious spread.

An evident tactic of propagandists is to flood the zone with emotional binaries. It seeds chaos, disrupts chain of thought, and invokes group selection posturing. I believe the "smart/dumb" binary to be one of the most powerful, and engaging with it, even if one thinks they are on the right "side", disrupts and obfuscates the pursuit of truth.

Most people that say both side AND still vote, almost never vote in primaries. Many don't even know what they are.

Speaking of sounding stupid...

at worse worst

FTFY

No, it makes them sound informed. Saying that "The one party who keeps openly destroying the environment is sooooo much better than the other party who keeps openly destroying the environment" is what makes anyone who says it sound fantastically silly and at worse stupid.

The real solution would be having more than 2 parties. I mean, TECHNICALLY we do but not really.

You are going to have to fundamentally change the way we vote and how we count them. In a single-choice-vote, plurality system it will mathematically trend toward having exactly two viable choices, no matter how many are allowed on the ballot.

Mixed-member proportional would probably work well for the House and Senate, and some judicial/executive positions. Where that's not tenable (President, Governor, etc.) a Condorcet Method should be employed.

I believe the system is fundamentally broken but I still participate because you can't fix it by doing nothing. But yes, my coworkers are not people who's opinions will be changed by fact and reason. They're also the same people who say, "facts don't care about your feelings." Imagine that. But then they get all bent out of shape about how "no one is doing anything about this!" but then refuse to vote. My guy, you're not doing anything either!

Did you even read what I wrote? This is not my opinion, this is what I have been told. I don't think this is correct and that these people are honestly just being lazy and don't want to take responsibility for their vote.