Please, go ahead and explain why it's okay for China to commit crimes against humanity? Why is it okay for a government to oppress any group of human beings for any reason?

First you cite a source for that allegation that doesn't, if you track back to its original source, come from ETIC or a similar separatist/terrorist organization, a delusional Christian Nationalist in Austria who believes God wants him to destroy communism and calls himself an expert on China despite not being able to speak or read any Chinese, or a CIA funded NGO with a history of backing regime change operations.

While you're at it you can come up with a good explanation why every Muslim country that's investigated the matter has determined China is not committing crimes against humanity against a Muslim population, but is doing exactly what they said, operating a highly successful anti extremism program that's drastically reduced Wahabbist terrorism in the space of a generation, and created education and employment opportunities all across the region.

Then you can explain Col Lawrence Wilkerson's 2018 address to the Ron Paul Institute, and how that doesn't make absolutely any accusations against China with respect to Xinjiang incredibly suspicious. Also how China has managed to perform the first genocide in history without a commensurate refugee crisis, or how China is so much better at infosec than Isntreal that there aren't any videos of the supposed genocide occurring. I mean, we've seen what a live-streamwd genocide looks like in real time, why is the best evidence of China's supposed crimes a bunch of grainy photos that have been persuasively debunked?

If you establish that China is actually doing crimes against humanity we can talk about it. But starting from a position of "western media narratives don't need evidence" is proof of exactly the kind of critical thinking failure (or lack of critical thinking in the first place) that I was talking about.