you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

Tbf Trump did get raided first but they never tried to deport Melania or anything soo he is still crossing new lines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

    Well Trump actually broke some laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

    Well a judge signed off on these raids so..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    Yes but the first instance is the government doing what it's supposed to and the second is fascsits weaponizing the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    So when the government prosecutes the people you like it’s good but otherwise bad?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    When the government prosecutes people who actually committ crimes then it's good, yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    They have to do an investigation to see if she committed a crime..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (7 children)

    She did not commit a crime. Everyone knows this is weaponizing the DOJ to persecute Trump's enemies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (6 children)

    If the system is weaponizable it is broken and needs to be completely redone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (5 children)

    Regardless, she did not commit a crime. They do not need to do an investigation unless there is evidence of a crime. This is a smear with zero evidence made up by some conservative blogger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (4 children)

    But there had to be evidence a judge signed off on the warrant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 18 hours ago (3 children)

    A judge they had in their pocket signed off on persecuting one of Trump's political enemies. Sure, ok.
    If there were real evidence, this would've happened years ago when she were first running for office. It didn't because this is made up bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago (2 children)

    Problem being that if the Justice system can be corrupted like this then the whole system is failed and no warrant should be valid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah you already said this. That doesn't change the fact that Omar's did nothing wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago

    So as a society what do we do if warrants cannot be trusted and in general law enforcement is just a game of who does the government want to go after? You cannot have an Omar did nothing wrong and didn’t deserve this in the same society where any warrant is considered “valid.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Allison Gill mentioned on her show Trump’s done similar stuff in the past without a warrant. I’m not sure but isn’t this what the Kavanaugh stops allowed? He also ordered the seizure of ballots in several cities without a warrant.

    Not that you can’t find some dip shit MAGA judge to sign off when you need one…but why take the extra step when your goons blindly follow orders?

  • source
  • parent