Last week, 1,500 unionized nurses gathered in a large conference room at the Marriott Marquis in San Francisco to cheer for a cause they’ve championed for years: Medicare for All.

Considered a radical and even fringe idea for decades, interest in sweeping healthcare reform has surged as progressive Democrats have won a series of primary victories ahead of November’s crucial midterm elections. Most prominent among its advocates is Democratic US Senate nominee from Michigan Abdul El-Sayed – who took the lectern before these nurses.

“Medicare for who?” asked El-Sayed – “ALL!” the crowd shouted back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Should be mediCAID for all.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Medicaid is sadly less popular then Medicare because Americans don't sympathize with the poor / don't think they'll be poor while they know they'll eventually be old and need Medicare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Medicaid has way too many restrictions applied against coverage. You basically have to be poor, in order to qualify for coverage.

    Medicare doesn't have those restrictions. It's basically just age-related...so expanding it just means making the same coverage available to more age-brackets.

  • source
  • parent