you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Are you sure about that? Are you absolutely sure that the Dem party is not moving in an anti-trans direction?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    In 2036, the choice will be between a red candidate who wants to kill all trans people, and a blue candidate who wants to jail all trans people, and OP will argue earnestly in favor of the latter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago

    Well that's a fuckin delusional take. Vote in the fuckin primaries, vote in every election for the most progressive option and guess what? We'd have a pro trans party. We literally all watched progressives fuckin sweep recently and all you bitch-asses still just immediately capitulating all agency to the big bad dem establishment like you couldn't fuckin primary them out if you'd just take some goddamn responsibility and vote in your actual best interests for fuckin once but no, be an edgy fuck online.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Omg, are dems arresting trans people??

    Wait, no, phew! You’re just entitled and full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Who is at fault here? When Dem politicans promote anti-trans rhetoric, why is it trans people's fault for believing them? I think the blame should pointed at the politicians needlessly throwing away voters instead of the voters being scapegoated.

    Establishment Dems have already floated the idea of running anti-abortion candidates. Will you blame pro-choice advocates when those candidates lose?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago

    Establishment Dems have already floated the idea of running anti-abortion candidates. Will you blame pro-choice advocates when those candidates lose?

    If they advocated for letting a worse candidate (a republican) win in a general election, YES.

  • source
  • parent