The rationale is interesting. I'm glad they kept the logo as it's recycling ♻️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

No, but it was a helluva lot more obvious what it was. I guess I understand their reasoning, but it's yet another obscure name among the innumerable ones out there already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Do you really think anyone would see the name "postmarketOS" and right away think this is a Linux distro for phones? Perhaps the "-OS" part gives it away that it's some kind of OS, but so are a lot of projects that end with "-OS".

    For example: ReactOS, RedoxOS, ChibiOS, MicroOS, TempleOS. Can you really look at any of these names without knowing beforehand and tell what it is about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    GrapheneOS doesn't instill the same view either. I think post market was better fit than this more obscure name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I had heard the "PostmarketOS" name in the past but it never sparked my interest, the name made me think it was an OS made for some old obscure hardware that I'm likely to not own or that I would not be able to buy anymore. Either that, or a distro meant for old PCs.

    I just found out that it comes shipped in PinePhones and that it's actually a modern OS not necessarily constrained by a specific line of legacy hardware.

    I think it's better a name with no implicit meaning than a name with a misleading meaning. All names are obscure when they just appear, I don't think "PostmarketOS" was such mainstream name.

  • source
  • parent