Im not dodging anything, I accept the results of the study, but i dont think its useful for comparison to a non-democracy.
just to be clear here, before I respond, can you state how you think voting works in china, and why it isn't a democracy?
"Freedom House was founded in October 1941, with Wendell Willkie and Eleanor Roosevelt serving as its first honorary chairpersons. Most of the organization's funding comes from the U.S. State Department"
uhhh
-freedom of speech/expression
bad in both places, both have it enshrined in their constitution
-freedom of religion
we'd need to talk about specific points, but yes the US is better, but i'm kinda thinking the US's stance is backfiring hard on this one, religion is pretty evil.
-protection from discrimination
the US is so obviously worse that this isn't worth a discussion? native americans? reparations? all the genocides and human experimentation? every single foreign country they have invaded and "freed"
-right to representation
seems about even to me? awful in both places, the study I gave touched on this, what good is representation if it accomplishes nothing?
Conclusion
In this article, we investigate whether Chinese local governments are responsive to public opinion on environmental protection issues and how the involvement of various response agencies enables the policy responsiveness. Using dynamic panel analysis, we observe a weak but statistically significant policy responsiveness in Chinese local governments, measured by the extent to which online public opinion has an impact on the fiscal expenditure. We also find that this impact is significantly enhanced by the involvement of response agencies with high levels of political authority and interest homogeneity with the public. More empirical studies are needed to better understand the administrative organisations of policy responsiveness, not only within China but also as comparative studies of countries with different political systems.
slightly better in china, it seems, since there is SOME correlation.