They’re not ‘useless’ though, they continue to work offline, and that kind of hyperbole makes it hard to take this seriously.
Yes, my TV also works offline... I cannot load any channels or watch anything new but it still works
I really am asking here, if 14 years isn’t enough, what minimum would be? I’m asking what you think is reasonable.
I already explained this... actually I already explained the other part as well...
There is an old saying that translates to something like "the worst kind of blindness is found in those who just do not want to see"
here it is again:
Again, the law has to define what’s “reasonable” (and that is already a very shitty way of defining law but that’s how the US does it).
Is it reasonable for Nintendo to say “people did not expect tariff refunds therefore we don’t have to give them while WE did collect them”? well, if there is no case law that argues one way or the other, anything can be argued as “reasonable”
This lawsuit would help establish what is legally reasonable and if it does not take place, reasonable is whatever Amazon wants… and you seem to prefer that scenario?