IMHO if we allow, the community gets drowned out by AI vomit and it is harder to see handcrafted loved projects that are easy to modify and distribute.

My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.

Are folk in agreememt with this line? Would love to hear your thoughts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boonhet@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Autocomplete in your favourite IDE is basically AI assisted too.

I think a reasonable line in the sand is: Does the author of the PR understand what they're doing with this PR and how/why it works? If the PR is complex (like a whole new feature) then the author should be challenged on parts of it even if it looks OK at first glance.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, if the Autocomplete uses Ai features then it is Ai assisted. But what about searching for bugs? Nothing is Ai created in this case, but it is Ai assisted. Even if you did not incorporate any generated code from the Ai model.

And what about projects who do not disclose it? We have to deceiver and guess if its just Ai assisted or has some parts that are Vibe coded. This is what I mean it gets time consuming, and adds friction. How do we even know if this was not just copy pasted from the web (which seems to be okay for smaller stuff), and how do the person know if the copy pasted code was created by an Ai assist? They might not even know if they are honest.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent