I'm not an AI techie and I'm not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I'm having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I've heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can't really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

Based on what? I have seen no evidence to the contrary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    emergent behaviour and microscopic differences in huge amounts of parallel computations

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Emergent behavior meaning what?

    Which “microscopic” differences?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Hey, Socrates

    look for "emergent behaviour in computers" and specifically the non-programmed behaviour

    look for "floating point non determinism" to see how the same program can produce different results

    keep in mind you asked me on what I base that I think computers don't only do what they are programmed to do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments