you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Parrelli explains that Signal is instituting the $3 fee to prevent scammers from creating multiple accounts and flooding the network.

$3 does not seem like nearly enough to prevent this

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    You can only reach a few people before an account is banned due to reports.
    And most people won't fall for scams.
    And you also wanna pay the remaining operation not spend most returns on signal accounts.

    Because of that there's a massive difference in the kind of spam you get when it costs cents vs a few bucks per account.
    I definitely get more spam on discord than signal for example.

    3 bucks is also a lot more than it takes in some places to get numbers, so maybe long-term signal will try to also limit those number spaces with a fee? Either way this is enough to keep numbers as the weak link not numberless signups.

  • source
  • parent