One small step from that to this:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

No, this time a car stopped people from using the car to do violent crime. Surveillance and cars are both bad, but this one's a win.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Is it though? Yeah, of course, the entire argument to justify intrusive surveillance is that it will catch people. The fact that it did doesn't invalidate the intrusive surveillance.

    Next, all you have to do to force everyone to submit to surveillance is price cars so most people can't afford them and they have to use the surveillance mobile instead. After that you have to be rich to afford privacy.

  • source
  • parent