you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 98 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I tried reading the article, got about halfway through and it just keeps repeating the same thing over and over again. It starts with this:

There’s a shortage coming that nobody’s put on a slide yet: senior engineers. Every company on earth is about to want one who can drive a fleet of agents with judgment — and almost nobody is making new ones anymore, because AI ate the entry-level work juniors used to learn on

That's it. That's the whole article as far as I was willing to read. There's almost no extra information further down. Holy hell.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Typical modern article. And then some people are going angry "You obviously have read only the title, not the article in full". Wonder why people limit themselves only to titles? Maybe because the article is 2 sentences worth of data fit into 20 paragraphs of the life story of Jane Smith who was amazed and sat in awe after reading e-mail that will change her life?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Typical modern book as well. I keep reading classic philosophy just for being amazed at the amount of concepts crammed in under 100 pages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Never read modern philosophy, but I had completely opposite experience with mid-late XIX century philosophy: too much words and too much repeating of the same thought from too many different angles. But I'm a technician type of guy so I might just have been unlucky with the set of authors. Never cared to read much of philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment