you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 315 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (83 children)

Kraft said in a statement on Instagram: “I have dedicated much of my life to building bridges between all people. I believe deeply that all lives are worth protecting.

That's like saying 'all lives matter' in response to the Black Lives Matter movement; it's disrespectful of the point being made.

  • source
  • hideshow 83 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 month ago (66 children)

    It’s like thinking reverse racism is a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 66 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    He very literally tried to pull a "I can't be racist, I have black friends" because he's worked with a couple people who happen to be Palestinian

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I married one, and I'd never say that. Even after decades of marriage, having learned the language and having lived in the Middle East for years, there are still some unwritten norms and cultural differences that occasionally take each of us by surprise and lead to misunderstandings. We muddle through. Our kids are more fluently bicultural.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 56 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    You are technically correct; people can absolutely be racist against white people.

    Now I'll explain why you're being downvoted anyway.

    "Black Lives Matter" became a slogan because police disproportionately target black people. They stop and question black people at a far higher rate than is warranted by actual crimes, they arrest people at a far higher rate than white people, and they kill black people at a far higher rate than they kill black people.

    The statement is very obviously not just a literal statement on the value of human life; it's an accusation that police seem to think black lives don't matter. "All Lives Matter" simply pretends to be ignorant of the entire background and reasoning behind the phrase.

    Israeli's have been massacring Palestinians and leveling their cities. They have inflicted orders of magnitude more suffering on Palestinians in the last years than Hamas has during its entire existence. The only way to equate the two is if you believe that Palestinian lives are worth significantly less than Israeli lives, and yes, that would be racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I think people assume I'm saying that white people are victims of systemic racism, which is not at all what I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I don't have the sociological definition of racism at my fingertips, but IIRC it includes the need for a power imbalance, which is generally why people push back when folks say that minority groups can be racist against against white people. Our entire country was (arguably still is to a large degree) set up to where there is a huge power imbalance in favor of white people.

    If you just want to make the very real point that white people are victims of bigotry also sometimes, rather than get into this repetitive debate about whether there can be racism against white people, IMO you can just say "bigotry" or "racial prejudice" and carry the same message you intend to without having to have this tired debate about whether white people can experience racism.

    Unless you aren't tired of the tired debate, but I know I sure am.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Just to make things even more complicated, there can be a power imbalance at a macro level that favors group A over group B, whereas at a more micro level, there can be situations where the power balance is reversed. I'm a white kid who grew up in a barrio (long story) and I experienced that at an early age. I got the shit beaten out of me many times because my face didn't fit, as well as being on the receving end of disparaging and sometimes threatening comments (especially when I was dating one of the girls from the neighborhood).

    So I think you're onto something with the terminological distinctions you're making. Equating "racism" with "systemic racism" gives a lot more truth to the "white people can't experience racism" claim. But along with systemic racism, there's ad-hoc racism and related forms of bigotry that can run counter to the prevalent bias.

    Still, if my name were Gonzalez instead of my very common Irish surname, and I applied for a university place or (even more) a job, I wouldn't be at all surprised to be treated more negatively, even with the same qualifications. I've seen it happen to my friends and neighbors.

    There's a whole, long discussion to be had about intersectionality, and about the fundamental incommensurability of the many possible axes of privilege and oppression. I'm not motivated to get into that now, but undertanding it makes some otherwise counter-intuitive observations make more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Yeah that's just called racism. White people don't get a special prefix when it happens to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    But it is a thing... People can absolutely be racist against white people.

    It's not a thing. If someone hates another person based on their race, that's racism. This idea that it only applies to hate towards black people is very much a US only issue. The rest of the world understands that racism towards any person is wrong.

    Technically you could argue that "reverse racism" would be explicitly liking someone based entirely on their race, and nothing else. But even that's a stupid way of looking at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Thinking it just doesn’t exist elsewhere is naive.

    That's not what they said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They understand that it's just called racism, but it's not universally seen as wrong.

    That's actually a valid point. But I was speaking in a more general sense, in that literally nowhere else in the world will you hear the phrase "reverse racism".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You don't have to be rude, they are literally using the word racism as defined by dictionaries. There are two separate definitions usually listed, one is belief in a races superiority over others, the other is the systemic bias against a racial group. Since 2020 at least it's been common that people have used it to mean specifically only the second definition and use other terms like racial prejudice for things like prejudice against white people but it's used that way still plenty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    When people mean the systemic part, they include the word systemic next to the word racism. You can't just assume it's implied and get pissed when people don't understand your made a last mental shortcut combining two things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I did not mean to imply that the idea of race is legitimate.

    Yeah. Race, in general, is a fundamentally unsound way to categorize people. Humans are clinal in every single characteristic associated with race. Attempting to boil a multidimensional continuum down to a binary distinction is a fool's errand.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Hating people who have nothing to do with your oppression because of their skin color is racist. Full stop.

    It's like saying men can't be raped because women are the majority of victims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Calling out that race for bad behavior is also acceptable, wouldn't you agree?

    I'm not who you are replying to but that sounds racist and I don't agree you should attribute bad behavior to a race. There's better and more accurate ways to attribute bad behavior, basing it on racial identities is inherently racist in my book, and inherently misleading.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    People that are oppressed by a certain race hate that race because of the oppression, not the race.

    ...

    Calling out that race for bad behavior is also acceptable

    Here we have ladies and gents, a perfect example of a racist that thinks he is not racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Calling out that race for bad behavior is also acceptable, wouldn’t you agree?

    No, that is pure nonsense. It is not a "race" who is oppressing anybody. It is certain groups of people, usually a political and economical elite who are doing the oppressing. Conflating it with race (which is not even a real concept) is the epitome of racism and directing efforts at the wrong reasons. Oppressors love that kind of bigoted stuff, because it causes people to miss the actual factors of oppression.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I've lived in a place (and visited a couple others) where being a white person meant being subjected to suspicion and discrimination. It wasn't reverse racism, it was xenophobia and plain old garden-variety racism. Being on the receiving end was highly instructive, as were the supportive comments such as "but we don't mean you, you're one of the good ones." There were also cases of extreme discrimination and abusive behavior towards minorities that, to an outsider like me, seemed almost exactly like the majority population.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I hate how the Right can't understand context.

    "What? You think only Black Lives Matter? ALL LIVES MATTER! Wait I'm the bad guy for saying all lives matter? What the fuck?" - The Right said not understanding what Black Lives Matter means

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)