you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 month ago (12 children)

But it is a thing... People can absolutely be racist against white people.

It's not a thing. If someone hates another person based on their race, that's racism. This idea that it only applies to hate towards black people is very much a US only issue. The rest of the world understands that racism towards any person is wrong.

Technically you could argue that "reverse racism" would be explicitly liking someone based entirely on their race, and nothing else. But even that's a stupid way of looking at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    would be explicitly liking someone based entirely on their race, and nothing else

    That's definitely a thing: fetishizing people because of their race or some other characteristic. I know some weebs, for example, who get deep into that groove. I also have known people who have a kink about having Black sexual partners. And I know two Black women who each like to date white guys and do roleplay with them that involves racial abuse. Both are upper middle class and highly educated. I find all of those fetishes weird, reductive and creepy. But maybe that's just me. Others might draw their lines elsewhere.

    I also know couples where the partners are from very different ethnicities, and they're not all weird about it. For example, I didn't get with my wife because of her ethnicity, it was about her intelligence, character and (OK, I'll admit it) strikingly good looks. I knew nothing about her culture at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    That's definitely a thing: fetishizing people because of their race or some other characteristic

    I know that's a thing, but would you call that "reverse racism"? That's the point I was trying to make, that such a term is ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    The rest of the world understands that racism towards any person is wrong.

    They understand that it's just called racism, but it's not universally seen as wrong. There are a lot of countries with significant racial prejudice, besides the US. Thinking it just doesn't exist elsewhere is naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Thinking it just doesn’t exist elsewhere is naive.

    That's not what they said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    They said everywhere else thinks it's wrong. I guess what I said technically isn't the same, but if everyone thought it was wrong it wouldn't exist. Regardless, my point still stands that it isn't seen as wrong everywhere else either. There are a lot of places where it's seen as normal, or even good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Their point was that thinking there's a one way directionality associated with the term between specific races is a seemingly unique US perspective. Elsewhere that directionality doesn't exist and it's understood that it can go any direction, even if the bigotry exists there too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yes, they corrected what they said, but the original comment says it's seen as wrong everywhere, and it isn't. I'm not going to debate this any further. I don't know why you're arguing with me. I agreed that it's just called racism in my first comment. What is your goal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    You doubling down on being wrong, and me pointing it out, is not me arguing with you. There's no edit marker on that comment. Keep digging that hole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Yes, it still says everyone thinks racism is wrong! I agreed it's just called racism! I just disagreed that everyone else thinks it's wrong. Is this incorrect?

    Also, are you using an alt to downvote me and upvote yourself? There's no way someone is following this this closely. Fucking weird for you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They understand that it's just called racism, but it's not universally seen as wrong.

    That's actually a valid point. But I was speaking in a more general sense, in that literally nowhere else in the world will you hear the phrase "reverse racism".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment