Are you simple-minded? Do you struggle to read? Which of these is the correct answer to the question of "how can you manage to think I said Russia does not interfere in elections?"

I think you are a run-of-the-mill western chauvinist, inundated by the racist propaganda that floats around on mainstream media. I think this because of your childish, simplistic reasoning for the actions of Russia and your sad attempt at a historical analysis with a conclusion so reductive it would make Franz Halder ask you to take the russians more seriously.

One could literally do the same spiel you did for every colonial power. Yet I somehow doubt that you'd make pseudo-intellectual musings about France based on the nations long and proud colonial history or its current-day imperial actions in Mali or control over the financial policy of a dozen foreign nations. For some reason I doubt that you'd reduce the United States bloody history in South America to "Trump bad" or "the American genetics are just made to be evil, just look at their history!"
Somehow I have a feeling you'd cry about nuance if one were to imply that all dastardly things done by the brits are due to their current leader or some inherent quality (and if you dont believe me, just look at their history! They love war! They even sent Boris Johnson to Ukraine to have him talk them out of a peace treaty!)
If these were the countries being discussed, then I have a feeling you wouldnt be so bold with generalising statements based on a lacking historical "analysis".

The racism is not you pointing to something Russia did. The racism is you acting as if the thing happening is uniquely and inherently Russian