if.. (hackertalks.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/carnivore@discuss.online
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

https://discuss.online/post/44161218

https://discuss.online/post/25952420

https://discuss.online/post/25791954

It becomes a asymmetric time waster for a good faith discussion. Someone reads your paper, responds to it, and you drop 5 more without engaging in the first paper in depth. I’m not saying you would do that, but it is the common pattern, which is why i have stopped reading people’s papers unless they are willing to engage in good faith discussions.

Alright, so where do you want to start? Point me to one, instead of your personal library and board game collection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    You asked what I based my current opinions on, so I gave you the literature, and then you imply i'm wasting your time by citing things I haven't read - that isn't very nice of you.

    If your going to read one book - Ketogenic - The science of therapeutic carbohydrate restriction in health. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-03604-7 Full Book is available on the normal book sharing websites. It doesn't say anything about herbs and spices, but it is far and away the most important and impactful book i own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    You asked what I based my current opinions on, so I gave you the literature, and then you imply i'm wasting your time by citing things I haven't read - that isn't very nice of you.

    You must be a Republican politician with that level of gaslighting and projection, that's literally what you've been doing to them the entire time, when they clearly read and were willing to discuss everything posted by both of you. That isn't very nice of you.

  • source
  • parent