succinctly (media.piefed.social)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 months ago (7 children)

They're good at things you're not good at. If you're good at something, and you see them try to do it, they're shite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    LLMs are already better than humans at math and cybersecurity, since around spring this year. If you are a human in those fields, you’re worse, period. I’m not sure why you’d just to around blatantly lying about things you clearly don’t understand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well it's impossible to lie about something you don't understand, that's just called being wrong. And I may be. But I'd argue that while AI has solved notable math problems and created notable security patches and hacks it is not actually "better" than all humans at those things; and I'd be astounded if someone who had actual expertise, which your comment shows no proof of, agreed with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    How is it not better if it can do things humans can’t? OpenAI just solved another 100 problems no human could solve. Mythos finds decades-old vulnerabilities in common software on the regular. What can humans do better? You don’t have to be an expert to see where this is going. The entire field of math is basically in a panic right now, signing petitions left and right to try and stop AI from killing their field. Cybersecurity only fares better because not every company is allowed to use mythos and a big part of the job is security training for employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments