cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/70869345

Credit to Jack Scully

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 2 months ago (33 children)

Jraphics Interchange Format

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    joint pottographics interchange group

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Jay-fog is going to be my new

    That said it’s still gif (not jiff).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    MySQL would love this kind of recognition, instead it just gets turned into "My"SQL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Technically the original JPEG container format is "JIF", throwing another wildcard into the mix.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_File_Interchange_Format

    The base specifications for a JPEG container format are defined in Annex B of the JPEG standard, known as JPEG Interchange Format (JIF).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    The pronunciation of an anagram's component words has no bearing on the anagram's pronunciation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I think that question is best posed to the Joint Photographic Experts Group, better known as "jay-fegg".

    (For the record, I'm in camp "G as in Graphic", but it's still true that an acronym's source words don't dictate the pronunciation.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Right, in cases where an acronym is pronounced as word it generally follows the normal convention of the letters that form the word. Which would STILL result in the same pronunciation as "g" in graphics or gun.

    Of course accepted convention and tradition can also matter. If a word is generally pronounced a certain way then that is how its pronounced. Which of course STILL gives us the soft G.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Right, in cases where an acronym is pronounced as word it generally follows the normal convention of the letters that form the word.

    Meanwhile, the GNU Project calls itself "guh-nu" and then chooses a gnu ("nu") as its mascot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They dont absolutely define it, but they certainly contribute. Assuming one or the other as sole definer seems silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Except they don't. The vast majority of acronyms have at least one letter that's pronounced differently than in the word it's representing. Any correlation is purely coincidental.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So occasionally one letter doesnt fit with the rest... doesnt that mean that the rule is not absolute and my statement is correct? That often the originating phrase contributes and often it does not, and that neither is exclusive to the other?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    NASA and LASER would like a word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    wait hang on... nasa works. laser is more iffy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    If you're pronouncing NASA and Aeronautics the same way you're definitely saying one of them wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    it's a very subtle difference, if you don't count the /Γ¦/ diphthong. i think i could get away with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Congratulations on proving it's pronounces /jiff/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments