you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 months ago (18 children)

You're joking, right? There's a reason genotype and phenotype aren't synonyms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    There's also a reason identical twins look alike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    Don't know why you're being downvoted, it's a good point that shows that genetics is the main factor for your appearance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Identical twins also share the same womb, so it's not 100% genes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Same womb, similar growing environment, etc.

    But even then, they're not perfectly identical. Very similar, but not the exact same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Maybe but there is more to the outcome than just genes. Certain ones can be activated of deactivated and that can be done by epigentics for example. Gene expression is a thing.

    The AI would need way more information that just DNA to generate an image of the person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    But they could probably get 90% the way there with just DNA. I think that was the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    No, they couldn't, that's what's being said. If you have a huge state machine with billions of parameters, toggling a different subset can yield wildly different results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    But there are examples of twins who grew up apart and still look almost identical

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Forensic DNA phenotyping is actually being used. Of course it's not perfect, but it can give a direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Hadn't heard of this before but I'm more than a little skeptical, especially if its being used for policing

    "More recently, companies such as Parabon NanoLabs and Identitas have begun offering forensic DNA phenotyping services for U.S. and international law enforcement. However, the science behind the commercial services offered by Parabon NanoLabs has been criticized as it has not been subjected to scrutiny in peer-reviewed scientific publications. It has been suggested that it is not known "whether their ability to estimate a face’s appearance is better than chance, or if it’s an approximation based on what we know about ancestry” -DNA phenotyping wiki

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment