4
$12m koala underpass not used in five months (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/environment@aussie.zone
1 comment fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why are they hammering ahead with another one? If the key differences are larger footprint but better use. It seems a no brainer to do the rest as overpasses.

Edit: 'what' to 'why'

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •