It proposed a new goal of limiting the “overshoot” of rising temperatures and eventually figuring out how to undo the temperature gains, a highly uncertain path.

Archived copy of the article

Additional coverage:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

The amount locked in is more like 2°C if we did a crash shift off fossil fuels and meat. Those higher numbers presuppose that people won't forcibly shut down fossil fuel using plants and equipment before the end of its useful life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment