690
Hey Canada, just wanted to let you know there's alternatives. (brilliantmaps.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 59 points 2 months ago* (12 children)

Not a meme; I am an American and I think this would be the exact right kind of petty bullshit to respond with, please push for this, Canadians. It is exactly this kind of petty, stupid bullshit that Trump participates in and responds most to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    American style petty bullshit isn't going to accomplish anything. This kind of thing costs Canadians and doesn't impact the US at all. This is the exact kind of petty bullshit Trump does regularly since it's popular with Americans.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

    British Columbia basically did a similar thing by declaring permanent daylight savings time because, according to the premier, they're no longer going to wait for the US to move as well before moving themselves.

    Except now the situation is objectively worse than it was before, because BC is geographically in the UTC-8 zone, but permanent Pacific Daylight Time is the same as permanent Mountain Standard Time (UTC-7). Except they don't call it Mountain Standard Time in BC, they stubbornly continue to insist they're in the UTC-8 zone. Except they don't call it "Pacific Daylight Time" either, they call it just "Pacific Time". No "Daylight". Despite the fact that their standard time is what the rest of North America calls Mountain Time.

    They had four good choices, and chose none of them:

    • UTC-8 year round, call it "Pacific Standard Time"
    • UTC-7 year round, call it "Mountain Standard Time"
    • UTC-8 or UTC-7 year round, call it "Western Canada Time".

    Decent idea, rubbish execution.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    They probably just saved some paperwork. Anyway, all people care were the time zone difference, not name

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    The name causes confusion. Let me give you this example. What time UTC would "17:00 PT" be?

    That question depends now not only on what time of year it is, but also where. "Pacific Time" now no longer uniquely identifies a single timekeeping scheme.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    What I understood was PT is UTC-7, PDT is UTC-7 and PST is UTC-8, am I right? I am guessing in Canada you all were refering to PST and PDT as 'pacific time' and that causes confusion?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    "Pacific Time" means "whatever the civil time is in the Pacific Time Zone, accounting for daylight saving time". So that would be 23:04 (UTC-7) as of writing.

    If today's date were instead 30 December, "Pacific Time" would be 22:04 (UTC-8) in Washington, Oregon, and California, while it would be 23:04 (UTC-7) in British Columbia and Yukon. Both would be called "Pacific Time" despite not being the same time, and both being on standard time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Ah right, got it.

    Weird not to have any coordination at all. Another example I found - CST can simultaneously mean Central Standard Time (North America), China Standard Time, or Cuba Standard Time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why call it anything? UTC-7 or -8 are explicit, less confusing internationally & shorter

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Because UTC-7 and UTC-8 are also wrong. The label "Pacific Time" means, in the United States and Mexico, the civil time standard that observes standard time at UTC-8 and daylight saving time at UTC-7. You cannot call this standard merely "UTC-8" because then it's wrong half of the year.

    It is important to note that by calling year-round UTC-7 "Pacific Time", British Columbia and Yukon are the ones stepping out of the programme to do something idiosyncratic. The rest of the Pacific Time Zone (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, California, and Baja California) has a greater population than the entirety of Canada. There are approximately 56 million residents of the non-Canadian portion of the Pacific Time Zone, where standard time is UTC-8, compared to 5 million in the Canadian portion, which is UTC-7.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    No that's what I mean, once you have a fixed timezone there is no need for naming that timezone anything at all, it can be referred to by its UTC offset

    It's something that regularly gets under my skin when people announce events like this:

    extensive list of times with timezones such as PDT, EDT, BST etc. for a single event

    Instead of all of this, a single UTC offset would be so much clearer

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent